In Latvia, there is the institution of the Ombudsman, not long after many domestic conflicts since 2007, just completed the first term of the first incumbent. And start the trouble, because novel Apsītis will not start again and it appears elsewhere (among the lawyers of the country) to give anyone who would not town red with this offer. The ombudsman must be a lawyer, but it should according to popular opinion. It seems that all potential candidates fear of the Ombudsman and / or before the deputies of the Saeima that occupy this office by vote.
Now all this is nothing new. Since the mid-90s there was a human rights office, which had been founded with support from the OSCE and was led by Olaf Bruvers was. Bruvers, was born in Riga, during the Soviet times as an opponent of the regime arrested a short time and then lived in exile. After the regained independence of the country he was elected as a Member of the Christian Democrats in Parliament and then Minister of State for human rights issues, although his party did not the coalition was a member. But two years later he got on the list of Democratic (Center) party in the Saeima, that political power in those days had many of the old communist cadres organized.
The office suffered under his leadership, the bad Funding, which was criticized by President Vaira Vike-Freiberga. Only in 2007, finally succeeded to create the office of the institution of the ombudsman. And even then, the policy could not agree on a candidate. By the time the government influential People's Party nominated law professor at the University of Latvia, Ringold Balodis, and the nationalist of the For Fatherland and Freedom ported professor of political science and Exillettin Rasma Karklina there were two candidates in the parliament were not a majority.
both candidates were not politically feasible. Balodis' obstacle has been particularly his lack of political neutrality, but his reputation as a scientist were questioned and his publications by the then President of the Constitutional Court, Aivars Endziņš heavily criticized. Ironically, it was Balodis that years later advised the nationalists in question discussed the constitutional amendments.
Rasma Karklina other hand, has a hand on a legal education and no experience in the field of human rights, but as an exile Assuming you also lack roots in the Latvian society. Although the New Age then Karklina supported, had their chances from the start even lower than the Balodis'.
main problem was, indeed, that itself the ruling coalition failed to agree on a candidate. Thus, finally, the Constitutional Court Apsītis novel was chosen, whose reputation is above reproach, but was immediately confronted by his order in the economic crisis with the discussion on whether his office should not be the necessary austerity measures fall victim. But Apsītis is now alleged to have not even mixed active enough. On television, he recently announced that he had not pushed in 2007 for the office and do not stand for a second time.
can
Four years later, the coalition parties have already unable to agree on a common candidate again. The larger partner, the agreement was to cover for weeks and called not a single name - as long as the smaller partner, the Union of Greens and Farmers the proposal of the opposition Harmony Centre, the liquidator of the bankrupt Riga health insurance Juris Jansons positively assessed. Only then moved the Unity and proposed the administrative judge and former employee of the Human Rights Office Kovalevska Anita.
But the haggling had already started before. After the first constitutional lawyer Jautrīte Briede was touted as potential candidates, the support is said by the union, underlined some politicians that there was still if not decisions. The prospects of these candidates were low, as the head of the Union of Greens and Farmers, August Brigmanis, pointed to the incompatibility of unity. have been
For the party Brigmanis' may be a further obstacle that was Briede Soros scholarship once. On this organization have grown up in Latvia countless conspiracy theories. The "Soros" is in the relevant circles as an insult.
The former constitutional judge and member of Unity, Ilma Čepāne was also mentioned, but declared themselves to have received no such offer and also do not want to run. The political Culture in Latvia was sadly, the politicians ignored the recommendations of the Office of Ombudsman, and politicized the election. You have mentioned several lawyers, but all had the checkered flag.
The aforementioned former President of the Constitutional Court, Aivars Endziņš, candidate in 2007 unsuccessfully for the presidency had is, claims to also not available.
The dispute over the occupation now disturbs the peace coalition. Right after the election in October, there had been for the government formation, various potential models. The legislation comes as Russian Harmony Centre with the Union of Greens and Farmers also with 51 mandates the absolute majority of 100 MPs. What may be too short for governance may be, but allow a single vote to break away from the coalition reason.
Unity reacted a little like the "huff" and made the democratic for a country even absurd proposal, all offices orders by the Parliament - Attorney General, Head of Audit, Head of the Anti-Corruption Agency, etc. - in the future in an open ballot carried out. This lifted the reputation of parliament. The other groups described the proposal as a contrast populism. President Valdis Zatlers in turn, repeated his proposal, Such offices should in future be filled on a proposal of the President. In fact, such a discussion is typical for Latvia. Is there any problems, also criticized the Latvian journalist and media scholar Ainārs Dimant, first a change in the "Articles" is discussed.
Juris Jansons said during hearings in the fractions, he was with the Harmony Centre is not politically connected. For a small country like Latvia, but not untypical turned out that the members of the party, Juris Silovs, the Jansons accompanied by the dates, an old colleague of Jansons from his time at the National Bank.
Jansons on 3 March with 53 votes.
Now all this is nothing new. Since the mid-90s there was a human rights office, which had been founded with support from the OSCE and was led by Olaf Bruvers was. Bruvers, was born in Riga, during the Soviet times as an opponent of the regime arrested a short time and then lived in exile. After the regained independence of the country he was elected as a Member of the Christian Democrats in Parliament and then Minister of State for human rights issues, although his party did not the coalition was a member. But two years later he got on the list of Democratic (Center) party in the Saeima, that political power in those days had many of the old communist cadres organized.
The office suffered under his leadership, the bad Funding, which was criticized by President Vaira Vike-Freiberga. Only in 2007, finally succeeded to create the office of the institution of the ombudsman. And even then, the policy could not agree on a candidate. By the time the government influential People's Party nominated law professor at the University of Latvia, Ringold Balodis, and the nationalist of the For Fatherland and Freedom ported professor of political science and Exillettin Rasma Karklina there were two candidates in the parliament were not a majority.
both candidates were not politically feasible. Balodis' obstacle has been particularly his lack of political neutrality, but his reputation as a scientist were questioned and his publications by the then President of the Constitutional Court, Aivars Endziņš heavily criticized. Ironically, it was Balodis that years later advised the nationalists in question discussed the constitutional amendments.
Rasma Karklina other hand, has a hand on a legal education and no experience in the field of human rights, but as an exile Assuming you also lack roots in the Latvian society. Although the New Age then Karklina supported, had their chances from the start even lower than the Balodis'.
main problem was, indeed, that itself the ruling coalition failed to agree on a candidate. Thus, finally, the Constitutional Court Apsītis novel was chosen, whose reputation is above reproach, but was immediately confronted by his order in the economic crisis with the discussion on whether his office should not be the necessary austerity measures fall victim. But Apsītis is now alleged to have not even mixed active enough. On television, he recently announced that he had not pushed in 2007 for the office and do not stand for a second time.
can
Four years later, the coalition parties have already unable to agree on a common candidate again. The larger partner, the agreement was to cover for weeks and called not a single name - as long as the smaller partner, the Union of Greens and Farmers the proposal of the opposition Harmony Centre, the liquidator of the bankrupt Riga health insurance Juris Jansons positively assessed. Only then moved the Unity and proposed the administrative judge and former employee of the Human Rights Office Kovalevska Anita.
But the haggling had already started before. After the first constitutional lawyer Jautrīte Briede was touted as potential candidates, the support is said by the union, underlined some politicians that there was still if not decisions. The prospects of these candidates were low, as the head of the Union of Greens and Farmers, August Brigmanis, pointed to the incompatibility of unity. have been
For the party Brigmanis' may be a further obstacle that was Briede Soros scholarship once. On this organization have grown up in Latvia countless conspiracy theories. The "Soros" is in the relevant circles as an insult.
The former constitutional judge and member of Unity, Ilma Čepāne was also mentioned, but declared themselves to have received no such offer and also do not want to run. The political Culture in Latvia was sadly, the politicians ignored the recommendations of the Office of Ombudsman, and politicized the election. You have mentioned several lawyers, but all had the checkered flag.
The aforementioned former President of the Constitutional Court, Aivars Endziņš, candidate in 2007 unsuccessfully for the presidency had is, claims to also not available.
The dispute over the occupation now disturbs the peace coalition. Right after the election in October, there had been for the government formation, various potential models. The legislation comes as Russian Harmony Centre with the Union of Greens and Farmers also with 51 mandates the absolute majority of 100 MPs. What may be too short for governance may be, but allow a single vote to break away from the coalition reason.
Unity reacted a little like the "huff" and made the democratic for a country even absurd proposal, all offices orders by the Parliament - Attorney General, Head of Audit, Head of the Anti-Corruption Agency, etc. - in the future in an open ballot carried out. This lifted the reputation of parliament. The other groups described the proposal as a contrast populism. President Valdis Zatlers in turn, repeated his proposal, Such offices should in future be filled on a proposal of the President. In fact, such a discussion is typical for Latvia. Is there any problems, also criticized the Latvian journalist and media scholar Ainārs Dimant, first a change in the "Articles" is discussed.
Juris Jansons said during hearings in the fractions, he was with the Harmony Centre is not politically connected. For a small country like Latvia, but not untypical turned out that the members of the party, Juris Silovs, the Jansons accompanied by the dates, an old colleague of Jansons from his time at the National Bank.
Jansons on 3 March with 53 votes.
0 comments:
Post a Comment